Can Ukraine’s drones make up for the weapons and ammo it’s not getting?

There is only one answer
An important tool in the war
They are not an alternative
What Ukraine needs now
A key defining innovation
Drones on the Black Sea
Tipping the scales of war
A more nuanced problem
Battlefield drones aren’t perfect
Drones can’t replace artillery
Other problems with drones
Drone success rates are low
It can take a lot to kill a tank
Drones vs. artillery on the front
Drones can’t down missiles
Ukraine needs air defense systems
An important tool but not enough
There is only one answer

The Ukrainian Armed Forces have revolutionized the modern battlefield with the use of drone warfare. But will these crucial weapons systems be the key to victory for Ukraine against Russia? It's a question that has only one answer.

An important tool in the war

Drones have been one of the most important tools Ukraine has used to offset the major imbalance of military power between itself and Russia. But these weapons systems are not enough according to President Volodymyr Zelensky. 

They are not an alternative

"We produce a lot of drones, but they are not an alternative to any kind of weapon," the Ukrainian President said during an interview with German reporter Paul Ronzheimer on April 2nd according to a translation by Business Insider.  

What Ukraine needs now

Zelesnky explained that Ukraine has proven itself with drones and increased production has helped the country’s armed forces a lot. But he noted drones were not “a substitute for long-range weapons, missiles, long-range artillery."

A key defining innovation

Drones certainly have been one of the key defining innovations of the war since Russia launched its invasion. These weapons systems have been engineered to destroy tanks on the battlefield and strike deep inside Russian territory. 

Drones on the Black Sea

Sea surface drones have arguably been the defining factor that has led to Kyiv’s major successes on the Black Sea, a fact that has been pointed out by countless war pundits and news agencies as that front has changed over time. 

Tipping the scales of war

In March 2024, the Associated Press reported it was the smart use of remote-controlled and explosive-laden drone boats that “allowed Ukraine to tip the scales of naval warfare in its favor despite Russia’s massive superiority in firepower.”

A more nuanced problem

However, the fight on land has been a lot more nuanced. First person view drones have taken over the battlefield as reconnaissance tools and as aerial explosives. But they are not enough to counterbalance what Russia can bring to bear. 

Battlefield drones aren’t perfect

On April 9th, Samuel Bendett of Virginia-based think tank the Center for Naval Analyses told Foreign Policy that the first-person view drones being used on the battlefield are not perfect. They have one big issue that makes them problematic. 

Drones can’t replace artillery

Bendett pointed out that first person view drones have a short range so even if Ukraine does lack adequate artillery, it can’t replace its artillery needs with drones since they can only be used at distances of up to 20 kilometers or 6 miles. 

Other problems with drones

Foreign Policy added that Kyiv’s drones have cheap cameras which make them difficult to use in bad weather and at night. They also often carry improvised munitions that can be denoted in mid-flight. Moreover, their success rate may be mixed. 

Drone success rates are low

Rob Lee is a Senior Fellow in the Foreign Policy Research Institute’s Eurasia program, and he explained the overall success rate of Ukraine’s drones is less than 50% percent, and the drones that do get through likely aren’t destroying their target. 

It can take a lot to kill a tank

“You usually don’t kill a tank the first few times,” Lee said. “It can take 10 or more [FPV drones] to kill a tank.” However, the ultimate problem that Ukraine faces is the number of soldiers Russia can bring to bear against the Ukrainians, something that adequate artillery ammunition could assist in handling and something a drone cannot replace. 

Drones vs. artillery on the front

First person view drones can’t match the high rate of fire or explosive effects of artillery ammunition according to Foreign Policy. Moreover, electronic warfare has no effect on artillery shells. “It’s just a bombshell that’s flying through the air,” Foreign Policy noted. 

Drones can’t down missiles

Another important aspect of the war that drones cannot influence is the ongoing aerial missile and kamikaze drone attacks, a problem that Zelensky made clear in comments he made during an April 2nd interview with German journalist Paul Ronzheimer.

Ukraine needs air defense systems

"If we don't have air-defense systems and the appropriate long-range weapons to match Putin, he will destroy our country," Zelenskyy said Tuesday. "This is what this war will look like: complete destruction, destruction of border areas, cities, villages, and so on."

An important tool but not enough

While drones have been an important tool that has helped Ukraine win victories both on land and sea, their long-range, sea surface, and first person view drones aren’t enough to replace the crucial weapons systems Kyiv needs from its Western allies. 

More for you