Trump may soon be facing a new big legal problem

Remember that loan that may not exist?
Trump is already facing 88 charges
Asking for a new investigation
Trump’s mystery $50 million dollar loan
The loan may never have existed
Trump’s civil fraud case in New York
Comments from Barbara Jones
Falsehoods and mischaracterizations
An internal memo that proved little
What the memo showed
Why was Trump reporting the loan?
Action must be taken
Part of a possible tax scheme?
Trump may have violated the law
An investigation to safeguard public trust
What will happen next?
Trump has a history of fibbing about finances
Remember that loan that may not exist?

A leading political watchdog and non-profit organization working to bring both ethics and accountability back to Washington has asked the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to look into Donald Trump for possibly violating another law.  

Trump is already facing 88 charges

The former president is already facing eighty-eight state and federal charges connected to his various alleged crimes but Trump may soon be adding a new situation to his legal issues if one federal watchdog gets its way. 

Asking for a new investigation

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has lodged a formal complaint with the FBI and asked the agency to investigate whether or not the former president made false statements about a loan that violated the law, Law & Crime reported. 

Trump’s mystery $50 million dollar loan

According to the watchdog group, Trump may have made false statements by reporting a $50 million loan that he owed to Chicago Unit Acquisitions LLC. The former president did this nine times in his public disclosure reports. 

The loan may never have existed

Reporting such a large loan isn’t an issue but the fact that this loan might not have ever existed is a major problem. The existence of the loan was first questioned by Barbra Jones, the special monitor assigned to Trump’s businesses in his civil fraud case. 

Trump’s civil fraud case in New York

The Daily Beat reported Jones explained in a letter to Judge Arthur Engoron during the trial that when she questioned the Trump Organization about the loan, she was told it was “between Donald J. Trump, individually, and Chicago Unit Acquisition for $48 million.”

Comments from Barbara Jones

“However, in recent discussions with the Trump Organization, it indicated that it has determined that this loan never existed—and thus that it would be removed from any upcoming forms submitted to the Office of Government Ethics,” Jones added. 

Falsehoods and mischaracterizations

Trump’s legal team called Jones' comments “falsehoods” and a “deliberate mischaracterization” of the situation at the time, claiming that the Trump Organization never said the loan wasn’t real according to The Daily Beast’s reporting. 

An internal memo that proved little

An internal memo regarding what the Trump Organization said about the loan was produced but, as CREW noted in its complaint to the FBI, the memo provided  did “not evidence the loan’s prior existence.”

What the memo showed

According to the complaint from CREW, the memo only showed that as of December 4th, 2023, the alleged loan between the former president and Chicago Unit Acquisition had “‘no amounts are due or payable’ and ‘no liabilities or obligations are outstanding’”

Why was Trump reporting the loan?

“It is not clear why Mr. Trump would report a non-existent loan, but the law must be vigorously enforced against office holders and candidates who flout the disclosure process through repeated false statements,” wrote CREW's President Noah Bookbinder. 

Action must be taken

“Failure to do so not only renders the system meaningless, but, more importantly, undermines the work of ethics officials who must ensure that financial disclosures are accurate so that potential conflicts of interest that present national security risks can be brought to light,” Bookbinder added. 

Part of a possible tax scheme?

Bookbinder suggested in the complaint from CREW to the FBI that the former president’s allegedly non-existent loan deal “could be part of a tax-avoidance scheme, known as debt parking,” something The Daily Beast has also previously reported. 

Trump may have violated the law

“Recent disclosures by a court-appointed monitor indicate Mr. Trump may have violated federal law by falsely disclosing a liability owed to one of his own companies on multiple financial disclosure statements he filed between 2015 and 2023,” Bookbinder wrote. 

An investigation to safeguard public trust

“If Mr. Trump falsified his public financial disclosure statements, he will have undermined the public trust that these laws are designed to protect. An investigation into this matter is important to safeguard that public trust,” Bookbinder concluded. 

What will happen next?

Whether or not the FBI will look into whether or not the former president wilfully made false statements is not yet known, but the story seems to be picking up more traction as it becomes clear there may be a problem with Trump’s public disclosures. 

Trump has a history of fibbing about finances

“Donald Trump has a long history of lying about his finances, but there's a big difference between lying about them in the press and lying about them on a government disclosure," Bookbinder explained in a statement on CREW’s website. 

More for you